Politics Are Fµ©king Poison! #PoliticsArePoison , Poison 8: The Gangsters Of The World Run The World No Matter What Flags The Syndicate Waves In Their Crusades
Politics Are Fµ©king Poison! #PoliticsArePoison , Poison 8: The Gangsters Of The World Run The World No Matter What Flags The Syndicate Waves In Their Crusades
Poison 8:
The Gangsters Of The World Run The World
No Matter What Flags The Syndicate Waves In Their Crusades
All gangsters follow similar patterns of behavior in various ways. The fundamental characteristic of the gang is the gangster disposition of ‘us’ against ‘them’, at all costs to ‘them’, whoever ‘they’ are. Anything that gets in the way is to be dispensed with, especially when it comes to the rules of society outside of the gang, or even to their own professed morality within it. All of this is of course justified and rationalized as a necessary evil in service to the greater good of the gang, with the good of the gang being the end that justifies all means to the ends of the gang.
The existence of the gang is to some extent the collateral damage of an indispensable feature of human evolution. We are tribal social creatures. We are evolved to be so by a naturally occurring implementation of strength in numbers, first with the forming of the bonds of family, then with the extended family of families called the tribe. This is further reinforced by the general survival instinct to fear the other and trust the same, almost no matter what the basis.
The primary characteristic of all of this is that of a naturally evolved mutual aid and defense pact, nothing inherently criminal in and of itself to begin with. And this has been indispensable to the spread, propagation, and establishment of the human species as the top of the planetary food chain. Gangsters are effectively the dark side of social unity and cohesion, and the tribal hierarchy that goes with it. Any social grouping that requires unity of action for common purpose, will also require some form of leadership and governance for the tribe, however large or small, whether simple or complex. The tribe cannot effectively defend the tribe if it’s all braves and no chiefs.
The unavoidable necessity of this minimal differential in power among the members of the tribe is just the beginning of gangster formation. As Lord Acton once famously stated that ‘Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.’ And even a little bit of power begins to corrupt at least a little bit. There is no immunity from this fundamental characteristic of human nature, no matter what the excuses. And the excuses are endless. This unavoidable power differential also stirs envy among those who don’t quite make it as chiefs. But they still want to wield that differential for themselves, no matter what they may tell themselves about why they want it.
The vying for power among chiefs and wannabes leads to conflict, even open conflict. In Sun Tsu’s Art of War, it is explained that war is deception, and that diplomacy, and essentially politics in general, are war by other means. Even without open warfare, truth and integrity to one’s own principles are going to be the first casualty of politics, as an allegedly necessary evil to be the better chief. Whatever the stated beliefs or principles of the chiefs or wannabe chiefs of the tribe, all are subject to the compromise by political expediency. And no one is immune.
Nicolo Machiavelli wrote The Prince ( 1532 ) as an advisory manual for aspiring politicians. It is also a something of a political application of the Sun Tsu strategy developed independently. In the work he outlines what sort of tactics are effective in the pursuit of power as a ruthless pragmatist, where deception and hypocrisy are just a part of statecraft. The very name Machiavelli has become synonymous with the scheming intrigue of realpolitik and the rationalization of expediency.
The corruption of realpolitik is only a little at first, but as the tribe grows and the power stakes rise, so does the corruption. When the power stakes inevitably take over completely as a consideration to the exclusion of all else, then the pursuit of power becomes an absolute obsession, and the corruption becomes absolute as a result. Unfortunately, expediencies work in the short term by definition. But they are shortcuts that almost always create long term problems that never get properly addressed, because the very thing that caused them is still expedient. New expediencies are created to mask the problems created by past expediencies that still remain in place, which can’t be removed without losing power, like a Jenga tower of expedient power.
Expediencies can also become part of the culture. The tribe will be led to accept the new normal out of trust for the chief. But as expediencies accumulate and take over a culture, the culture itself becomes corrupted and begins to falter in terms of what created and defined it to begin with. General moral decay and degeneracy is just a symptom of this political corruption by accumulated expediencies. Then the cultural Jenga tower falls. But a culture is built by its values, and a civilization is defined by the rules of its culture. Civilizations rise and fall by virtue of their operating rule sets, and how well these rule sets account for the causality of the world around them.
No matter how big and powerful you are, the universe is always bigger and more powerful than you are. And the causality of the universe is not optional, regardless of what you think is ultimately behind it, whether it’s God almighty or just some other great mystery to be named later, the Dao perhaps. Civilization itself is a temporary carve out from the natural organic chaos of the state of nature. Part of what makes civilization temporary is the corruption by political expediencies. It prevents proper adherence to the principles that built the culture up as a source of strength to begin with, in order to then be exploited and corrupted by expediencies.
The gangster is a creature of the expediency. ‘The ends justify the means’ is the universal creed of all gangsters, political or otherwise, no matter what they may say to the contrary. The stated creed of the gangster is only just to provide cover for the gangster with others, both outside and inside the gang, as well as for themselves and their conscience so that they can sleep at night.
But the corrupting expediencies are rationalized incrementally as the stated creed evolves and changes. Gangsters react in a couple of different ways to this evolution. Some become gradually more pragmatic, caring less and less about the stated creed, and becoming a more competent gangster as a result. Others double down on their evolving cover, and embrace the expediencies as a virtue, as a revelation of a deeper truth of higher values, gradually becoming cultic zealots as a result.
For the pragmatist, the corruption could lead to an embrace of the negation of the stated creed, embracing expediency for the sake of expediency, to be properly Satanic. Sometimes a Satanic creed of some kind may become the stated creed of the gang, even if only for psychological warfare purposes. It is said that the gang members of MS 13 worship death in the form of the Angel de la Muerte, the angel of death, and often have a tattoo of it somewhere on their bodies. The drug cartels along the southern border of the USA have taken to engaging in outright Satanic ritual killings and beheadings. Again, this is possibly just for psychological warfare value. But past some point it ceases to make any real difference. Satanic is as Satanic does, regardless of how you choose to define or excuse it.
For the religious crusaders, you get a mix of the true believing zealots on the one hand, with the more pragmatic gangsters in the mix on the other hand, pretending to be fellow zealots for the sake of their power grift. The pragmatists will tend to rise to the top more readily than the zealots just because they’re more conscious of the true nature of the power process. The zealots then become the useful idiots and attack dogs for the pragmatists calling the shots.
But just because the pragmatists may be in control, does not guarantee wise or even sane leadership. The corruption is intellectual as well as moral. No gangster is ever immune from hubris. One may even say that hubris is just a part of their fundamental nature. The gangster always thinks that they’re the smarter players of the game that they assume everyone is playing, just not as good as them. The pragmatists will want to feel good about themselves, and they will begin to believe their own hype to some extent. Then they will begin to make mistakes. And they will run the risk of being toppled either by the zealots, or by other pragmatists.
Of course, not all gangs are created equal in terms of competence and sanity, or even just giving a crap. And not all defining creeds are equal, either in terms of providing rules of behavior to be followed, or to provide cover for gangster rackets otherwise. All tribal creeds start as a belief in what is good, and they define rules for the fostering and protection of what they define as good. Whatever the source of this, if it doesn’t jive with the way the universe actually works, then the tribe will not survive for long trying to follow bad advice, never long enough to be corrupted or exploited by the gangster tendency.
The gangsters can only exploit what actually works, so they have a vested interest, whether they are conscious of it or not, in adopting a sound and viable creed, even if only for the sake of exploitation. Many civilizations have come and gone without ever even being known to history, leaving only mysterious artifacts behind to testify to their failed existence. Either they are conquered and destroyed for the sake of being too weak in the face of a greater and more savage enemy, or they are toppled and destroyed from within by their own faulty creed, or some combination thereof.
As far as creeds go, in Matthew 7:16 it says “You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?” In context, this is a warning against false prophets, warning people to pay close attention to the moral results of these would be prophets’ actions. But this warning applies just as well if not better to fraudulent systems, methods, and guides for civilization.
I have repeatedly written that it is an objective historical fact, that Christian theologically derived principles of natural law have produced the most powerful, the most prosperous, and the freest country in the known history of the earth, in the form of the United Sates of America. And western Christian civilization in general has built the bulk of what we consider to be the modern world, including the US. But I’m somewhat biased, but not because I’m a Christian.
I was baptized and raised Catholic, and I even went to catholic school for a while when I was younger. But I stopped being catholic as soon as they stopped making me go to Sunday school. But it was the freedom of the US, based on Christian principles, that allowed me the freedom to be a Daoist, so the results cannot be rationally denied by me at a minimum.
But Christianity is not alone in creating viable civilizations. Christianity isn’t even alone among the Abrahamic traditions in doing so. Judaism had produced a long surviving civilization in ancient times, eventually given birth to Christianity. Islam came later after Christianity and governs many nations on earth, totaling over two billion devotees worldwide. All of the Abrahamic traditions include the basics of the ten commandments, and they will naturally tend to have a lot of natural law principles in common.
Capitalism as an economic system is a product of western Christian civilization and the Abrahamic morality, especially with ‘Thou shalt not steal.’ For the communist, there is no difference or distinction between capitalism and gangsterism. And they consider religion to be the opioid of the masses. But communism itself is partially a willfully contrarian negation of Christianity to begin with.
To a large extent communism is mostly a hijacking of the Christian morality without the Christian God, and with the collectivization of guilt and virtue, and absolutely no forgiveness. The expediency of the collective explicitly and justifiably overrides everything in the minds of the communist zealots, because the collective is their god. Most people don’t understand how this renders all of their stated morality suspect, especially for all of their stated rules that might otherwise protect someone from the predations of the communist gangster racket.
It was Chairman Mao Zedong that wanted to get rid of the Four Olds, as part of his Cultural Revolution. These include old Ideas, old culture, old customs, and old habits. All of these Four Olds have been traditionally defined by old religion. So communism must destroy these things in order to replace them. Because ‘Thou shalt not steal’ means nothing to a communist except as an obstacle to their rackets.
In the original German version of this mind virus, the Communist Manifesto ( 1848 ), written by Karl Marx and Fridrich Engels, called for the abolition of the family, private property, morality, and all religion. From the context of western Europe, it is an explicitly anti-Christ ideology. In any context it is anti-civilization, posing as true civilization. And anyone who understands this will not trust the communists to any extent.
This functions as a partial limiting factor on the spread of communist rackets, but only among the well informed. It’s like some of the narration of the TV show Burn Notice. The main character Michael Weston was an ex-spy who would explain various aspects of spy craft in the voice over narration. In one episode he explains the nature of criminal conspirators. ‘If you lie with someone, they know you’re a liar… If you steal with someone, they know you’re a thief… If you kill with someone, they know you’re a killer… It tends to lead to trust issues among the criminal set.’ ( Michael Weston, Burn Notice )
To this I would add that if someone says they’re a communist, then you know all of the above to be true, and that they are not ashamed of it. It is explicitly a matter of principle for them to serve the expediency of the collective unconditionally. But even an explicitly Christian creed doesn’t necessarily do much better when being used to empower some other less extreme form of socialism.
The textbook definition of socialism is the state monopoly of the means of production. It is understood economically that when a monopoly is established in any product or service, quality suffers and costs soar. And the services of government are certainly no exception, no matter what its creed may be or where it comes from. Absolutely nothing is immune. Translated into political terms, this results in a continuously escalating burden of government tyranny, as the government grows out of control in size and becomes ever more openly brutal to maintain control of its rackets. All forms of the state are at least partially socialist in this way.
Benito Mussolini himself used to be a socialist and ran a socialist newspaper until he repackaged his socialist grift into its new fascist form. Fascism is defined by Mussolini as corporatism, or the merger of government and corporations. What this amounts to effectively, is the cartelization of the private economy under the cartel management of the crony corporations and crony politicians.
But control is ownership and ownership is control. And when the cartel management tells you what to do with your own business, even though it’s still in your name on paper, it is the cartel management who’s really exorcising ownership rights over your so-called property. So, the distinction between the rackets of socialism and fascism, is ultimately a distinction without an effective difference.
Democracy is certainly no panacea for all such gangster ills. At best, democracy is the tyranny of the majority, essentially mobocracy, if not an outright scam. And it must never be forgotten that it was the world’s first democracy that put Socrates on trial and sentenced him to death for what we now know as the Socratic method. Democracy is for suckers! And while unrestrained in the form of so-called direct democracy, it can be even more insanely stupid than communism. It’s all lunatic braves and no chiefs.
Democracy is only of value in keeping the peace among genuine equals, in order to avoid unnecessary war and conflict. But contrary to popular delusions, there is no such thing as equal in nature outside of mathematics. No one is truly equal to anyone else, or even just truly average. Human nature is far too complex for that level simplistic reductionism.
Being approximately equal in actual practical power may lead to the adoption of a democratic arrangement among those equals in order to keep the peace, not the other way around. Criminal syndicates and other large organizations are often run democratically by a committee of mob bosses at the top in a way that reflects a particular agreed upon compromise in terms of the balance of power between gangs. Democracy among the masses is useful as a check in a system of checks and balances, but it is hardly the most important check in the system. And since it is the tyranny of the majority, democracy itself must also be kept in check.
The institution of the state in general is often defined as a territorial monopoly on ultimate decision making and the administration of justice. I would define it as a territorial monopoly on legalized crime, that seeks to eliminate the competition for its own rackets. Congressman Dr. Ron Paul used to have a sign on his desk that read “Don’t steal. The government hates competition.” Or as Murray Rothbard once said “The state is a gang of thieves writ large.”
The only natural organic organizations of humanity are the family and the tribe, or the extended family of families. But the tribe isn’t just any organization with a brand logo or a flag that you can take the side of and root for. This is a false channeling and effective sublimation of the tribal instinct. There is no such thing as a tribe of strangers. Your tribe is your family and your friends, and the extended family and friends thereof. The nation properly defined is just a continuum of similar such tribes, with similar customs, beliefs, and language, and to some extent a common history and contiguous regional occupation. The nation state is the territorial monopoly over the representation and ultimate control of the nation.
The territorial monopoly of this is a part of what makes it a gangster racket. Tribalism is inherently territorial in general because it is an integral part of the nature of the tribe as a mutual aid and defense arrangement. If you can’t defend your space, then you can’t adequately defend yourself within that space. Even primitive nomadic tribes will often have their hunting grounds and burial grounds. Nomads essentially take their territory with them to some extent. And they will defend it. But the territorial monopoly of the state is not the tribe. And even the nation proper isn’t your tribe but a continuum of tribes similar to yours.
Effectively, every nation state is a territorial dominance scheme of one gang versus other gangs. Democracy is no exception to this. It is a specific example of it. The democratic election of mob bosses doesn’t fundamentally change the nature of the mob. It is only a popularity contest among mob bosses that provides a feedback mechanism to correct gangster overreach, and to maintain balance within the racket, in order to better sustain the racket. But this is still a desirable feature for the public because it makes the circumstances somewhat better for those who are subject to the mob’s rackets.
But his doesn’t necessarily make the mob better morally. If anything, it is in the best interests of the mobsters to do this, because it tends to make society around them more prosperous, giving them more to exploit and extract overall. This makes the racket more sophisticated and prosperous, and more powerful as a result, but not morally superior. It sets the stage for the gangsters to grow greedy and ambitious in their success, and then they will begin to demand more. They will tend to take their success for granted, and the balancing mechanism of democracy will then cease to provide proper restraint.
The competition among mob bosses also degrades over time with the overall success of the racket, due to the cooperation among competing bosses taking over from the competition between them. This is not the pursuit of peace for the sake of peace. It is to avoid unnecessary conflict that may jeopardize the rackets for everyone, out of the mutual interests of the fellow racketeers for the sake of the rackets held in common. Political parties are just competing gangs of likeminded gangsters, who share a common gangster creed that outlines their preferred method of running the same rackets, which they all want to run for themselves.
In a two-party system like the US, the competition among political gangs is relatively simple compared to multiparty systems. Superficially, it’s a binary choice. But in reality, it’s a two-option menu, with a third option that’s not on the menu for you. The third option is called bipartisanship. And it’s always heralded by the corporatist media as an automatic basis of legitimacy for the political rackets produced and run this way.
You never get to vote on bipartisanship directly. You can only vote for your side of the binary, to counteract the other side of the binary. But if they both collude together against what you voted for, in service to their racketeering interests held in common, then you get shafted with no recourse. Because the other side of the binary menu is also in on the bipartisan racket, and the political shafting that goes with it.
In a multiparty system, the partisan and multipartisan racketeering only gets more complicated, but not any better. If anything, the greater the complication is for the system of choosing the top mob boss of the day, the easier it is to run from responsibility for the actions and behaviors of the rackets, even for the actual mob boss in charge at the time. Whether it’s two options on the menu or more than two, as long as the options on the menu are restricted by the government racket itself, there will always be a public shafting by collusion among the government gangsters.
The two parties in the US function as a binary syndicate, with subdivisions within each of its two halves, replicating the same democratic divide and conquer strategy. Once given access to the menu, the newly added political gangs have a vested interest in not allowing other gangs to join, increasing their effective competition. And once they have established themselves as one of the menu limited options, they can also use that as leverage to similarly restrict their own internal menu. Then controlling access to the internal menu of the party can be used as leverage to create, control, and/or eliminate factions within them. It’s like a gangster franchise system for a syndicate, for the likes of the Liberty Caucus, ‘The Squad’, BLM, and MAGA, etc.
A similar franchise system can be used internationally with control of finance, trade, and war. Client states and government sponsored NGOs are essentially puppet rackets and puppet states. And terrorists are just especially extreme zealot dominated gangs, that more often than not are just exploited as useful idiots by the bigger more sophisticated gangster rackets of the global syndicate. According to some internet conspiracy theories ( most likely true ), the Muslim Brotherhood was created by the British MI6 as a tool of proxy geopolitics.
From the same sort of sources, it is also believed that the CIA created Al-Quaeda as an offshoot organization from the Muslim Brotherhood, or order to be used as a proxy against the Soviet Union and others. And supposedly Israel created Hamas as another offshoot of the brotherhood, in order to undermine the relatively secular and somewhat socialist PLO. With more extreme religious zealotry, and even more socialism, this creates a more fearsome boogieman for Israel to fight, and to justify whatever they want.
The so-called clash of civilizations is really just a war on civilization itself. Different civilizations are pitted against each in order for all the involved parties to destroy each other. So that others can swoop in and impose their new civilization upon the planet, recreating it in their image. With Judaism, Christianity, and Islam pitted against each other in various ways, Godless communism can pose as an allegedly neutral arbiter and peacemaker between them, and then impose itself in their place. Championing cultural diversity is largely a divide and conquer strategy applied to religions by secular atheistic communists in democratic clothing.
This is essentially the Sum of All Fears ( Tom Clancy, 1991 ) strategy except instead of left over Nazis pitting the Soviet Union against the USA in order to destroy them both and come out on top relatively unscathed in the aftermath. Whole religions are pitted against each other in order to destroy them all and replace them, ‘To bring them together and in the darkness bind them.’ ( Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien, 1954 ) In what may be an apocryphal attribution, the notorious freemason Albert Pike supposedly wrote a prophecy in 1871, predicting future world wars. Whether this was or wasn’t genuinely written by Albert Pike, it doesn’t necessarily matter. And it doesn’t have to be a genuine prophecy in order to have been a plan.
Taking it as a plan by parties uncertain, the plan definitely seems to be operative at the moment. The plan calls for war between Judaism and Islam where both of them will be destroyed. Then there will be war between Christianity and atheistic communism, also destroying both. Then supposedly Lucifer and the Luciferian creed will take over as the ruling paradigm on the planet. And as the hypothetical new top of the gangster food chain on the planet, I guess that makes Lucifer the ultimate OG, where the G doesn’t stand for God. Or is that a misspelling of Sauron?
That’s what seems to be playing out in the middle east right now. With Israel and Hamas going at it, and the conflict threatening to blow up into a wider holy war in the region, it seems as though they’re up for the grinder. But I can’t honestly say that I really care that much. Because I can’t allow it. I can’t allow myself to be suckered into grinder over yonder. You can’t join that fight without adding to the problem and serving the evil that started it to some extent. You are only joining one gang versus another in unholy gangland warfare, not serving as a champion of civilization, nor a defender of the faith. All I can say is may the least savage win. And hopefully they can be the better gangster.
Whether we like it or not, there are no real champions of civilization in general among the so-called authorities anywhere, and there are none in control of any part of the middle east right now, nor anywhere else. The champions of religion and religious values of any kind, from any religion, either aren’t involved with profane government at all to begin with, or they are naive ignorant normies who don’t know that they’re dealing with gangsters in democratic clothing, many of whom are closet communists. Otherwise, the religious may become zealots and useful idiots in service to the process, maybe even joining some of the terrorists.
But if the plan holds, we are up for the unholy grinder next, whether we like it or not. Whatever comes out of the middle east, we are next upon the stage of the global atrocity theatre, where real blood and real bodies sell a story written in blood to begin with. So sayeth the global syndicate, just ask their media mouthpieces, not just apocryphal conspiracy theories/plans. Except the war is already here. Because it’s everywhere. It always was. And it most likely always will be.
All of politics are fµ©king poison. But if the personal is political for you, as the leftist activists likes to say, then you are a poison person. All of politics is deception and warfare. To engage in politics is to be poisoned by it. But politics can never be completely avoided. So we are all poisoned to some extent whether we realize it or not. Poison people beget poison people, more often by conversion than procreation. But politics poisons and corrupts everything it touches. And it consumes everything, but never produces anything but suffering in return.
We live in an era of fifth generational warfare, where every arena of endeavor in human society is a political battlefield. Politics infects everything, including but not limited to, economics, culture, and religion, even sex, and other forms of actual kinetic warfare. Everything is political psychological warfare. And from time to time it will seem as if the world itself were poisoned, perhaps even fallen and forsaken. Sound familiar?
Within the context of fifth generation warfare, part of the application of the Sum of all Fears divide-and-conquer strategy, is something known as anarcho-tyranny. Selective enforcement on a political basis, as well as tribal, cracks down on the law abiding normies of society. And they simultaneously let petty criminals, lunatics, and degenerates run amuck, with and endless array of tribal identities that can be pitted against each other in running battles in the streets that scare the normies into submission.
The divide-and-conquer strategy taken to its logical conclusion leads to universal fragmentation of tribal gangster identities, right down to the street level, potentially for every street. And we get a universal state of low-level gangland battle royal free-for-all everywhere. Never mind the grinder over yonder. Religious tribal identities will be especially provoked into street battles, along with even larger clashes internationally. This serves to get the religious types to all kill each other and wear each other out by attrition, thus controlling their overall numbers, exhausting most of their strength, and occupying the rest.
Cultural diversity is divide-and-conquer against religion more than any other aspect of culture. Because that’s where the disagreements come from. And because that’s a primary source of serious resistance to be destroyed. They like to taut diversity as a strength then site things like a cosmopolitan restaurant scene as an example. Then use things like that and the atrocity theatre at home and abroad, to shame people into giving up the more important things that they disagree on.
Cancel culture is about cancelling culture, socially neutralizing culture, in order to replace old culture, especially old religion, among other olds. It is a fifth generational warfare application of something Leonid Trotsky, called permanent revolution. The basic idea behind permanent revolution was that you couldn’t stop pushing for progress in the revolution because the forces of reaction may regroup and push back, jeopardizing the revolution.
It’s never good enough. And it can never be good enough. Because it can never be allowed to be good enough. Things are only ever allowed to be good enough temporarily, and selectively, as a steering mechanism for the engineered cult by the communist racket, cults manufacturing cults, like a cult franchise form of syndicate. Then good enough expires and you’re screwed if you can’t keep up with the permanent revolution, and whatever the current thing of the current year just happens to currently be.
This sort of fifth generational permanent cultural revolution may also be described as unrestricted or comprehensive warfare. A pair of Chinese communist military officers named Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui wrote a book called Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America ( 1999 ), as an example of a specific application. The comprehensive nature of this form of warfare necessarily includes the spiritual. And not just in the political sense of religions as cult gangsters vying for control.
If the spiritual is personal, and the personal is political, then the spiritual is unavoidably political, and the political is unavoidably spiritual. But the natures of the political and the spiritual are fundamentally at odds with each other. Politics are deception and war, and the spiritual is at least supposed to about deeper truth, or an approximation of it as matter of faith. They are effectively enemies at war within human nature. Always have been. And always will be. Even within the ranks of the gangsters, there is at least a tension, if not an outright conflict between the pragmatists and the zealots.
But if we wish to avoid becoming one of the gangsters that we don’t want to see in the world, how do we navigate this maze of manufactured madness that is fifth generational gangland holy war? First, remember to first what comes first. Your family, friends, and the extended family and friends thereof first, that is your tribe. Your tribe is neither your nation nor your nation state. It is not a corporation you work for or have stock in. Nor is it necessarily the school you went to. But even within your own family there may tension and/or conflict between the pragmatists and the zealots of various sorts.
Gangster creeds of the past have included things like the divine right of kings as of source of legitimacy and sovereignty, but not just because some king says so. That legitimacy and sovereignty are conditional upon protecting the flock, defending the faith, and upholding God’s law. It is simultaneously a spiritual mandate, a practical necessity to protect the tribe, and a set of rules for governance. But the pragmatists and zealots within your own family won’t necessarily see that the same way. So even within your own family the conflict of politics still remains at a lower level, like a lower dose of the same poison.
To keep the peace within your own family, you have no choice but to agree to disagree with zealots within your own family. And the pragmatists may not care to hear about your personal spiritual crusade. If you yourself are demanding something that no one wants to give you, then maybe you might be the zealot, even if the pragmatist within you rationalized it away as such. The deception and warfare of politics are within your own head to a large extent. We are all unavoidably poisoned this way to some extent. The poison is in your own skull!
The spiritual/political/psychological war is within us as well as all around us up to our eyeballs. However you and your family choose to sort it, there is no escape from this war. The war is produced by the human nature and the necessities of its evolution. There is no escape from the war when you bring the war with you, because it’s a part of you. And you are always the most dangerous gangster to you.
For a video on Albert Pike’s alleged prophecy, check out this Greg Reese video entitled Three World Wars to Usher in a One World Religion, on banned.video here:
https://banned.video/watch?id=6526bd6fa1be87a989b5198d
To read the text for yourself, Albert Pike Letter to Mazzini, The Illuminati Plan for 3 World Wars, August 15, 1871, is available as a pdf for free on Internet Archive:
For more on the economics of gangster foreign policy and gangster politics in general, check out the works of Murray Rothbard and Ludwig Von Mises from the Mises Insitute at Mises.org.
Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy ( 1984 ), by Murray Rothbard, free from the Ludwig Von Mises Institutes website:
Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution ( 1957 ), by Ludwig Von Mises, free from the Ludwig Von Mises Institutes website:
https://mises.org/library/theory-and-history-interpretation-social-and-economic-evolution
For a more gangster racketeering oriented look at foreign policy and government, check out War is a Racket ( 1935 ), by Smedley Butler, available for sale on Amazon:
For a pertinent example of fifth generational warfare by two serious professionals, consider Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America ( 1999 ), by Chinese military strategists Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, here on Amazon.com:
Beduh Beduh Beduh Beduh Beduh Beduh Beduh…
That’s All For Now Folks!
Feel Free To Make Noise Among Yourselves!
And May The Best Noise Win!
For More Like This, Try The Mad Science Reader On Amazon.com!